This procedure was justified expressly invoking the Nazi theorist of law Carl Schmitt, with the absurd construction of an "emergency state", presumably caused by Robert Kurz and Roswitha Scholz which, according to a mould of constabulary strategy, would have become pathological personalities. Most of the editorial staff who saw otherwise the things and was opposed to the "solicitous brio of the expulsion" was considered in that question irresponsible and accomplice suspect with them."
of Krisis. It is not by chance, but a collateral fully wanted effect, the fact that the Krisis Editorial staff is once again without women, after an interreign of only one year. Neither they forgave (them) to Robert Kurz to have supported this principle that questions the logical-deductive objectiveness of the old Krisis development.
As for the contents of this conflict, for a long time latent, it became worse with the formulation of a radical criticism of the Illuminism bourgeois philosophy, as it was developed by Robert Kurz in the discussion with the anti-German ones. The superficial community of the front line can lead to confusion for a moment due to the existent disagreement with regards to the criticism to the form of western, masculine and white subject. That disagreement can be revealed now: they wanted a "nicest" Illuminism criticism, to save moments of the androcentric universalism.
If this motivation includes a certain compatibility with the "pro-western" basic ideology of the anti-German ones, it precisely behaves on the contrary in the discussion about the importance of the anti-Semitism as crisis ideology. The designation of the anti-German ones correct aspects faces here with a tendency to objectively acquit the anti-Semitic syndrome. Also in this respect, the superficially common campaign against the militarism only hides a deeper dispute.
As for the content of the referred conflicts they were on no account mature and to a certain extent could have been solved in the Krisis frame, what was made unviable with its transformation in relationship problems and with the ensuing administrative "solution". As a result each one of them goes his own, and from now on also in different organizational platforms:
We call all of those who inside and out of Krisis sympathize with this objective to help us in consequence.
Hanns von Bosse, Petra Haarmann, Brigitte Hausinger, Claus Peter Ortlieb
They manifest their support from now on and they tender to collaborate with the new Magazine that, with the participation of Roswitha Scholz and Robert Kurz (whose presence is indispensable, you only need to take a look to the texts of this site), could develop the value criticism, deepening the criticism of the sexual dissociation and of the Illuminism subject.
The "new historical simultaneity" that we live, makes of this project an incentive for all women and men that today do not abdicate to producing their lives in planet Earth.
All the categories of the capitalism were "unfetished" by Kurz in a meticulous, thorough and deep way. Finally we had the monstrously authentic and up-to-date portrait of the capitalism in its death phase.
In his reckoning with the past, months ago Kurz directed the radical criticism against the Illuminism. It was an unavoidable task: to dare to make the radical criticism to the fundamentalist ideology of the capitalism.
There is "Tabula Rasa", another Kurz's masterpiece placing the Illuminism in the radical critic's pillory.
We want to openly express our consequent support to Robert Kurz, Roswitha Scholz, Hanns von Bosse, Petra Haarmann, Brigitte Hausinger and Claus Peter Ortlieb and our decision of continuing active in the translations and all the other tasks that we are able to do.
mailto: m.vallseca + @telefonica.nett